Am I a Buddhist?

It’s not something I had previously said in a sermon or congregational meeting . It’s one of those things that I’ve said to friends and colleagues but when with general church members, I’ve held my tongue. But a few Sunday’s ago, the level of my frustration was rising and the words came out of my mouth. Not surprisingly, what I said was largely ignored or misunderstood.

In the context of a meeting on the overall mission of the congregation and how that mission was manifested in the Sunday service and programs, I stated that I understood and respected the many perspectives expressive. I then explained that I found the experience of worship was not sufficiently inclusive for me. I went further to say that many Sundays I have difficulty attending worship because of the focus on a powerful deity who needs to be praised and glorified. There was a brief pause and the discussion went back to what kinds of hymns should be sung.

After the meeting, one of the members of the congregation said to me that she understood what I said and that I’m probably more comfortable with Buddhism. I was a bit puzzled by the comment. Last year, a survey was conducted in the congregation to assess topics of interest among members for programs. The greatest interest expressed by church members was to learn about Buddhism. In response to that, I contacted a friend of mine who is a Buddhist teacher who offered a three night series at our church on Buddhism. I have studied Buddhism and sat for meditation at sanghas and temples. But I’ve also participated in a large number of Native American ceremonies and worked with a couple of traditional healers and medicine people in providing care to Native American individuals with mental health conditions. Over a period of a few years I worked a great deal with the rabbi at a Reform congregation that had a large number of families with Jewish and Christian members. I’d frequently attend Shabbat services with that congregation and did joint presentations with the Rabbi about spirituality, traditions, and various practices. For about 18 months, I taught Christian spirituality to a small group of Hindu people who lived in an ashram. We found many parallels between the two traditions. Lastly, my “go to” spiritual writer when I find myself particularly disconnected from the spiritual dimension of life is the Sufi poet Hafiz. In all of these contexts, I’ve always known that I am rooted in the Christian tradition and a follower of the teachings of Jesus. I’m very comfortable in other religious and spiritual contexts, because I am grounded in my own Christian tradition.


(advertisement)


When it comes to Christian practice, I have a great deal of difficulty with a number of common practices that I see as reflective of a lack of theological development. From my perspective:

1. Prayer doesn’t change the laws of nature or physics. Nor is prayer about convincing a powerful being to do something for us. Instead, the power of prayer is that it changes us. Prayer has the potency to change our perspective as well as actually change the way our brain functions.

2. The tendency to anthropomorphize God is dangerous. God is fundamentally a mystery beyond our understanding. While we may understand aspects of the Divine Mystery as being like a father or mother or lover or friend, the essence of Divinity is beyond our mental capacity. This mystery was encapsulated by Christians in the third century in the articulation of God as Trinity, i.e., a dynamic exchange of relationships among equals. Reducing God to fit our mental capacity misses the wonder who is the Divine.


(advertisement)


3. God doesn’t need anything from us. When Christians insist that God needs to be praised, worshipped, and glorified, they are just creating a co-dependent deity who needs people for God’s own ego. Instead, I agree with the wisdom of Meister Eckhart that the only prayer that is necessary is gratitude.

I also recognize that the folks who belong to my church are good hearted but they just don’t understand my perspectives. Instead, I am Christian, first by birth and today by choice. While my up-bringing has influenced my understanding of Christianity, I’ve grown far beyond the limits of practices of my youth and been nourished by the wisdom of many traditions. I remain a Christian. Drawing from the book of Genesis, I affirm that the creative mystery of God (dahbar in Aramaic; logos in Greek) permeates the cosmos. That fundamentally the mystery of God is Trinitarian in so far as the essence of Divinity is found in relationship. The nature of God is generous love and self-giving. The realm of God is within each of us, it is around us, and it is to come, as Jesus explained in the gospels. The purpose of human life is to live in the mystery of the ever-creating, ever-loving God whose presence is found in our relationships with self, others, and with everything that is. God surely doesn’t need me nor need my adulation. Rather, God’s creativity called me into existence and for that I am eternally grateful.

As for my local church, I hope people there can grow beyond the limits of the theological paradigms so that they can be more expansive in their experience of the wonder of God. While I am with them, I hope to support them in their growth for we are all on a journey toward the fullness of life.

12 thoughts on “Am I a Buddhist?”

  1. N Darlene Tataryn

    You might want to look into Integral studies…Integral Christianity…Ken Wilber or Jeff Salzman… You are speaking directly to the same concerns and level of spiritual development or perspectives that those who are Integral in view speak of.

    Best Wishes!

  2. Hi Lou,
    I agree that God doesn’t need us to worship Him. We need to worship Him for our own benefit. We need to remind ourselves that there is a creator, as everything in science points to there being a creator. Prayer is for our benefit too. We do need to ask God for help. It reminds us that we are not sufficient unto ourselves. God does help in times of our need, as I can attest to, in my personal life. There was a meaningful time in my life when everything I held dear fell apart. I prayed like I had never prayed before. I still lost what I didn’t want to loose. My heart actually felt like someone put a hot dagger in it and twisted it. The pain was like real pain. I have never forgotten that pain. Mt faith took a big jolt. I said to God, hold on to me until I can hold on to you again and He did. After some time, I noticed God working with me, to restore the trust I had in Him. He was working with me long before I realised, but I noticed a pattern and I slowly understood what was going on. That was a lesson that I have never forgotten although it happened thirty five years ago. There are times when He withholds His intervention for His own reason. God is a mystery and I often question that mystery. I have faith that God is and is sustained by Self. The Trinity exists. The Australian song explains it in an understanding way to me ,”We are one but we are many”. I think Christianity today, has in general lost “something” in the essence of understanding the Devine. I think we are trying to make God into something that suits us, instead of accepting the reality of all that is God. I am starting to believe that all God wants of us is faith that He exists and He will do as He said He will. Obedience is impossible to sustain and rituals are for religious show. Buddha has note worthy attitudes but even that is as flawed as conventional religion and sects of various kinds.

  3. Lou,
    I enjoyed your article, which I found through your LinkedIn discussion.
    I lived the first half of my life in a traditional Christian church. (I now belong to C3 Exchange, Inclusive Spiritual Community http://www.c3exchange.org/ an independent group.)

    Most Christian churches that are still surviving and maybe even growing are evangelical or fundamentalist. I suspect that the reason there is such a gap in understanding between your philosophy and those in your church is that such churches are based on belief, not practice. It is likely that when they expressed curiosity about Buddhism, they wondered if part of it will fit their theistic belief system. When you wonder why they aren’t more open minded toward your thinking, you are thinking of a journey of experience and practice, not a belief system.

    I am sure you think about beliefs too, but probably have an open critical mind, while your fellow church members assume (perhaps without realizing it) that basic dogmas (unquestionable beliefs) must never be questioned. Just as ub the tradition I grew away from, belief (faith) always trumps reason.

  4. Brother Lou,
    Just remember the first time when Our LORD Jesus preached his first sermon, it was about how GOD was the GOD blesses “All” people and not just a select elite few…in other words,…inclusiveness!
    The other ministers and the congregation got so mad at him for saying this, they would have grabbed him and threw him off of a cliff.
    Be thankful that you only got a question from out of the judgement of another brother’s perspective, which at best is subjective to his own understandings and learnings.
    The Apostle Paul reminds us, “That it a small thing if a man judges him. He doesn’t even judge him self, but his judgement comes from GOD. And You know Brother Lou, once You accept GOD”s opinion nobody else’s opinion really matters. If GOD be for us, who can ‘in reality’ really be against us?
    Have a Wonderful Blessed Day,
    M. Huff, Jr.

  5. Thanks for your thoughts, Lou. I appreciate the care and gentleness with which you approach these things. I chuckled at the idea that your comment about discomfort at picturing God as a “powerful deity that needs to be praised and glorified” should suggest you might prefer to be a Buddhist, as if grappling seriously with the notion that God is beyond human understanding might suggest that one doesn’t believe in God! (Not to mention the misunderstanding that Buddhists are any less focused on the mystery of the transcendent Self than serious –i.e., mature — Christians are.) Your kindness in raising these points is a source of gratitude.

    1. Bill:

      While this is true in other religious traditions, one of the things that I’ve struggled with in a Christian context is the level of codependency in Christianity. Traditional models of ministry are extremely codependent, which I suggest is the fundamental root of the high levels of addiction and various forms of abuse among clergy. But codependent clergy are rooted in an ethos of a codependent deity who needs our continual adulation. If there is truth in the Biblical narrative, it is that human existence was meant to provide companionship to God, not to shore up a faulty ego. Of course, the seminarians and newly ordained clergy with whom I work are often taken aback when I suggest such things. (They probably aren’t the only ones.)

      Lou

  6. Lou,

    I went through many of the same experiences and transformations you describe and I have become an ordained interspiritual minister. I serve the Unity community in Monterey, CA, as Spiritual Teacher in Residence.

    As you are undoubtedly aware, it is difficult to be spiritually open and loving while remaining a member of a religious group that is by nature and definition exclusionary. Since most Christians believe they have the only truth and that those who do not believe in the same things they do are wrong (sinful, condemned, etc.), it falls on those of us who find ourselves in that place to redefine what it really means to be a Christian.

    In my teachings and in our tradition, we draw a clear distinction between the teachings OF Jesus and the teachings ABOUT Jesus. The basic teachings Jesus promulgated as we have them preserved in both canonical and non-canonical accounts center on unconditional love, compassion and a personal connection to the Divine. What the Christian church teaches is largely based not on those teachings but rather on the often misconstrued writings of Paul. In fact, I think the movement would better be characterized as “Paulianity.” There is nothing fundamentally wrong with this so long as it is acknowledged and understood.

    All churches and spiritual traditions teach a set of common beliefs that can be viewed as what is called the Perennial Philosophy. Mainstream teachings in all of those paths may distort those beliefs but their purity at the mystical center of all belief remains constant.

    In Unity we say that there is but one mountaintop, and many paths to reaching it. There is one God who is All That Is and all humanity are destined to reunite with that Divine Source and Center by whatever path they choose. Because it is impossible for most of us to go deeply in more that one path, Christians have chosen Jesus as their wayshower, not as their “savior”, which is a completely different matter entirely.

    Or so I believe as I allow all other beings to believe as they will.

    Namaste.

    1. Dan:

      Thanks for your comment.

      Indeed, it makes great sense to draw a distinction between the actual teachings of Jesus and the things that are commonly accepted as teaching about Jesus. It’s the latter that’s lead to a callus attitude toward the poor and marginalized individuals and has led to the odd belief that capitalism is somehow “Christian” by design.

      Lou


  7. (advertisement)


Leave a Reply